Abstract
Using U.S. steel firm data, we find that lobbying for import protection appears to be habit‐forming. To identify heterogeneity in lobbying behavior among firms, we use an expectation‐maximization algorithm to sort our firms into groups with different propensities to lobby and estimate the determinants of lobbying in each group. A two‐pool model emerges: occasional lobbyers' lobbying depends on their market performance, and habitual lobbyers' lobbying only depends on past lobbying. The latter tends to be larger steel firms whose business is more focused in steel. Our evidence is consistent with dynamic economies of scale in protection seeking breeding protection‐dependent firms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
