Abstract
This chapter evaluates the impact that habits of mind in British constitutional law have had on processes of truth telling in Northern Ireland. It suggests that article 2 of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) illustrates how core precepts of the British constitution can be of questionable value in the Northern Ireland polity and that the process of truth telling remains ill-defined and incomplete. However, it is not clear whether the habits of mind in British constitutional law will continue to retard the process of transition in Northern Ireland.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
