Abstract
In this paper, I define and defend the radical egalitarian distinction between individual acts and systemic or institutional patterns. My intended audience is both radical and liberal egalitarians; I assume that liberal and radical egalitarianism are neither mutually exclusive nor theoretically incompatible. I begin by sketching a liberal theory of institutions, and then extend this theory in radical directions. I argue that there are important informal as well as formal social institutions, such as language, morality, customs, and etiquette. Following that. I argue that some forms of discrimination and privilege are institutionalized, and that institutional forms differ in kind from individual ones. Of course, I do not deny either the existence or the wrongness of the individual forms. However, I argue that the institutional forms both are more prevalent and have worse moral and political effects than the individual ones. Hence they are the proper focus of (radical) egalitarian concern.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.