Abstract
Migratory birds face significant challenges across their annual cycle, including occupying an appropriate non-breeding home range with sufficient foraging resources. This can affect demographic processes such as over-winter survival, migration mortality and subsequent breeding success. In the Sahel region of Africa, where millions of migratory songbirds attempt to survive the winter, some species of insectivorous warblers occupy both wetland and dry-scrubland habitats, whereas other species are wetland or dry-scrubland specialists. In this study we examine evidence for strategic regulation of body reserves and competition-driven habitat selection, by comparing invertebrate prey activity-density, warbler body size and extent of fat and pectoral muscle deposits, in each habitat type during the non-breeding season. Invertebrate activity-density was substantially higher in wetland habitats than in dry-scrubland. Eurasian reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus occupying wetland habitats maintained lower body reserves than conspecifics occupying dry-scrub habitats, consistent with buffering of reserves against starvation in food-poor habitat. A similar, but smaller, difference in body reserves between wet and dry habitat was found among subalpine warblers Sylvia cantillans but not in chiffchaffs Phylloscopus collybita inhabiting dry-scrub and scrub fringing wetlands. Body reserves were relatively low among habitat specialist species; resident African reed warbler A. baeticatus and migratory sedge warbler A. schoenobaenus exclusively occupying wetland habitats, and Western olivaceous warblers Iduna opaca exclusively occupying dry habitats. These results suggest that specialists in preferred habitats and generalists occupying prey-rich habitats can reduce body reserves, whereas generalists occupying prey-poor habitats carry an increased level of body reserves as a strategic buffer against starvation.
Highlights
Migratory birds face the challenge of finding sufficient food resources on their wintering grounds to avoid starvation during the non-breeding season and to prepare themselves for the return migration to their breeding grounds
It is well established that competition affects the distribution of individuals on their temperate breeding grounds [8,9], it has been suggested that competition may be less important on the wintering grounds where migrant birds may have lower energetic requirements [10,11,12]
Large invertebrates comprised 2.3% of all individuals trapped in wetlands in 2013 and 2014, consisting of Arachnidae, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, compared with 1.1% in dry scrub habitats consisting of Arachnidae, Diptera and Hymenoptera (Table 2)
Summary
Migratory birds face the challenge of finding sufficient food resources on their wintering grounds to avoid starvation during the non-breeding season and to prepare themselves for the return migration to their breeding grounds To do this, they must select suitable wintering habitat, in competition with other migrant and resident species [1,2,3]. Overwinter survival of some longdistance migrant birds is closely linked to climate-driven measures of broad-scale environmental conditions on their wintering grounds, such as El Nino Southern Oscillation, Sahel Precipitation Index and Normalised Difference Vegetation Index [15,16,17,18,19,20] Such correlations imply that survival of some, or many, migrant species may be limited by overwinter foraging conditions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.