Abstract

American woodcock (Scolopax minor; hereafter woodcock) habitat use or selection has been studied extensively since the mid-1960s; most such studies, however, have taken place when and where young forest habitat selected by woodcock was relatively common. Woodcock population declines have been mostly attributed to loss of young forest vegetation types throughout the species’ range. Thus, understanding woodcock habitat selection and the benefits of habitat management in areas where young forests are rare is important in conserving woodcock and other wildlife that uses young forest. We conducted studies of male radio-tagged woodcock in Rhode Island, USA, when and where the extent of upland young forests in non-coastal areas comprised only 1.4% of the land area and was decreasing by ≥1.5% per year. We determined habitat selection of woodcock, then used the derived resource selection function to assess potential benefits of certain forest management scenarios for male woodcock and non-target birds. Landscapes comprising deciduous wetland forests, wetland young forests with nearby agricultural openings, or patches of upland young forest received relatively high use by woodcock. After integrating habitat management scenarios into GIS, our derived resource selection function suggested that creating fewer, larger patches of upland young forest and herbaceous forest openings may be less beneficial than creating more smaller patches. Openings with early-successional forest were an important component of woodcock habitat because they provided safe nighttime roost sites where mammalian predators were less active. These openings also provided habitat for a more diverse bird assemblage than unmanaged forests. Active habitat management is required to conserve woodcock populations in many landscapes, and managers should highlight the benefits of woodcock habitat management for non-target wildlife.

Highlights

  • American woodcock (Scolopax minor; hereafter woodcock) habitat use or selection has been studied extensively since the mid-1960s; most such studies, have taken place when and where young forest habitat selected by woodcock was relatively common

  • Our specific objectives were to: 1) illustrate the use of a resource selection function we developed for demonstrating responses of woodcock to different habitat management scenarios in areas where young forest is rare, and 2) highlight specific benefits of woodcock habitat management practices for woodcock and non-target birds

  • Our highest-ranked resource selection function (RSF) indicated that probability of use by male woodcock increased in deciduous wetland forest (β = 0.68390, SE = 0.06688, z = 10.225, P < 0.01), wetland young forest (β = 0.39340, SE = 0.09719, z = 4.048, P < 0.01), and mixed wetland forest (β = 0.19930, SE = 0.09273, z = 2.149, P = 0.03), and marginally so in deciduous upland forest (β = 0.09060, SE = 0.05612, z = 1.614, P = 0.11), compared to mixed upland forest [(reference cover type; see Masse et al (2014) for a more complete description of the RSF]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

American woodcock (Scolopax minor; hereafter woodcock) habitat use or selection has been studied extensively since the mid-1960s; most such studies, have taken place when and where young forest habitat selected by woodcock was relatively common. In Rhode Island, USA, shrubland or young forest vegetation types comprised only 3.3% of the land area during 2008 (Buffum et al 2011) These vegetation types covered only 1.4% of non-coastal uplands, sites where woodcock habitat management is most feasible, and their extent was decreasing by ≥1.5% per year (Buffum et al 2011). Because young forests have become less common on many landscapes, it is important to understand woodcock habitat use and the benefits of woodcock habitat management under current conditions This is true for managers in areas where young forest initiatives are planned or occurring; increasing the extent of these young forest vegetation types can help conserve woodcock and other wildlife. Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) comprised the majority of coniferous upland forests; various oaks (Quercus spp.), hickories (Carya spp.), and red maple (Acer rubrum) dominated deciduous upland forests; and red maple swamps were the most abundant wetland forest type (Enser and Lundgren 2006)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call