Abstract
AbstractUnderstanding the factors driving dispersal behaviour and habitat selection in reintroduced populations can be critical to reintroduction success. Social factors in particular can influence habitat selection, for example through conspecific attraction, and this can have both positive and negative effects on reintroduction success, particularly where multiple releases occur. In addition, little is known about how habitat selection differs between natal and post‐release dispersal within species. Often it is assumed that information from a species’ natal dispersal preferences and patterns can act as a guide for predicting post‐release dispersal behaviour, but no studies to date have examined this. We examine the factors influencing habitat selection during both natal and post‐release dispersal in a reintroduced hihi (stitchbird, Notiomystis cincta) population using species distribution models. We demonstrate a strong social effect in habitat selection of natal dispersers bred at the release area (largely the offspring of founders), yet find no social effect in habitat selection of juveniles translocated 2 years after the first releases occurred. In addition, we establish that environmental variables are important in habitat selection in both groups. We suggest (1) that consideration of social effects and conspecific attraction should play a role in planning reintroduction release strategies, especially if reinforcement releases are considered necessary, and (2) that it may not always be appropriate to assume post‐release dispersal in reintroduced populations will be driven by the same factors that influence natal dispersal.
Highlights
The behavioral and demographic factors affecting the persistence of colonizing populations remain largely unknown
Social-based dispersal behavior in a highly connected network When the translocated and remnant populations are highly connected (a = 1), socially induced habitat selection may compromise the establishment of released individuals to the target area (Fig. 2)
Conspecific attraction may lead to substantial risks of establishment failure regardless of the release method considered
Summary
The behavioral and demographic factors affecting the persistence of colonizing populations remain largely unknown. Improvements in population modeling have allowed for the integration of explicit and realistic behavioral features, such as conspecific attraction, on either natural [9] or reintroduced [10] population persistence and on metapopulation dynamics [11,12,13]. These approaches have focused on analyses of the viability of established populations and have not investigated the impact of dispersal behaviors on the establishment of a translocated population within a metapopulation
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
