Abstract

Agricultural land‐use practices have intensified over the last decades, leading to population declines of various farmland species, including the European hare (Lepus europaeus). In many European countries, arable fields dominate agricultural landscapes. Compared to pastures, arable land is highly variable, resulting in a large spatial variation of food and cover for wildlife over the course of the year, which potentially affects habitat selection by hares. Here, we investigated within‐home‐range habitat selection by hares in arable areas in Denmark and Germany to identify habitat requirements for their conservation. We hypothesized that hare habitat selection would depend on local habitat structure, that is, vegetation height, but also on agricultural field size, vegetation type, and proximity to field edges. Active hares generally selected for short vegetation (1–25 cm) and avoided higher vegetation and bare ground, especially when fields were comparatively larger. Vegetation >50 cm potentially restricts hares from entering parts of their home range and does not provide good forage, the latter also being the case on bare ground. The vegetation type was important for habitat selection by inactive hares, with fabaceae, fallow, and maize being selected for, potentially providing both cover and forage. Our results indicate that patches of shorter vegetation could improve the forage quality and habitat accessibility for hares, especially in areas with large monocultures. Thus, policymakers should aim to increase areas with short vegetation throughout the year. Further, permanent set‐asides, like fallow and wildflower areas, would provide year‐round cover for inactive hares. Finally, the reduction in field sizes would increase the density of field margins, and farming different crop types within small areas could improve the habitat for hares and other farmland species.

Highlights

  • Agricultural landscapes dominate in large parts of the world, with 38% of the Earth’s ice‐free surface being covered by cropland and pasture (Foley et al, 2011)

  • We could show that veg‐ etation height is a useful parameter to describe within‐home‐range habitat selection in highly variable landscapes

  • Within‐home‐range habitat selection depended on differences in field sizes and po‐ tentially the number of cultivated crops among the three study areas

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Agricultural landscapes dominate in large parts of the world, with 38% of the Earth’s ice‐free surface being covered by cropland and pasture (Foley et al, 2011). Smith et al (2004) investigated how vegetation height affected habitat selec‐ tion by hares in pastural landscapes in Britain. We predicted that hares would select for proximity to field edges, because they increase hab‐ itat heterogeneity (Petrovan et al, 2013) providing both cover and food, and more so with increasing vegetation height, because high vegetation might represent a physical barrier

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call