Abstract

AbstractDeclines of large predatory fish due to overexploitation are restructuring food webs across the globe. It is now becoming evident that restoring these altered food webs requires addressing not only ecological processes, but evolutionary ones as well, because human‐induced rapid evolution may in turn affect ecological dynamics. We studied the potential for niche differentiation between different plate armor phenotypes in a rapidly expanding population of a small prey fish, the three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). In the central Baltic Sea, three‐spined stickleback abundance has increased dramatically during the past decades. The increase in this typical mesopredator has restructured near‐shore food webs, increased filamentous algal blooms, and threatens coastal biodiversity. Time‐series data covering 22 years show that the increase coincides with a decline in the number of juvenile perch (Perca fluviatilis), the most abundant predator of stickleback along the coast. We investigated the distribution of different stickleback plate armor phenotypes depending on latitude, environmental conditions, predator and prey abundances, nutrients, and benthic production; and described the stomach content of the stickleback phenotypes using metabarcoding. We found two distinct lateral armor plate phenotypes of stickleback, incompletely and completely plated. The proportion of incompletely plated individuals increased with increasing benthic production and decreasing abundances of adult perch. Metabarcoding showed that the stomach content of the completely plated individuals more often contained invertebrate herbivores (amphipods) than the incompletely plated ones. Since armor plates are defense structures favored by natural selection in the presence of fish predators, the phenotype distribution suggests that a novel low‐predation regime favors stickleback with less armor. Our results suggest that morphological differentiation of the three‐spined stickleback has the potential to affect food web dynamics and influence the persistence and resilience of the stickleback take‐over in the Baltic Sea.

Highlights

  • Human-induced biodiversity loss strikes hard on higher trophic levels, and many populations of top predators have declined across the globe (Ripple et al 2014)

  • We know that selection can change population dynamics on short timescales and that overfishing in particular has the potential to cause exceptionally rapid evolution of target species (Conover and Munch 2002, Kuparinen and Meril€a 2007, Hutchings and Fraser 2008, Audzijonyte et al 2013)

  • Stickleback abundances and the distribution of plate phenotypes along the coast The food web field survey indicated the importance of production and predation in regulating the three-spined stickleback population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human-induced biodiversity loss strikes hard on higher trophic levels, and many populations of top predators have declined across the globe (Ripple et al 2014). In response to the severe economic and cultural losses resulting from these changes, various measures have been initiated to restore biodiversity at higher trophic levels (e.g., marine protected areas; Gell and Roberts 2003, Lester et al 2009). These measures may be ineffective because of pervasive but poorly understood feedback mechanisms within the ecosystem (Nystro€m et al 2012), as well as interactions between multiple human impacts that delay or prevent recovery (Frank et al 2005, 2011, Eriksson et al 2010). Evolutionary consequences of large-scale predator loss for lower trophic levels are not widely understood

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call