Abstract

Coastal human‐made structures, such as marinas and harbors, are expanding worldwide. Species assemblages described from these artificial habitats are novel relative to natural reefs, particularly in terms of the abundance of nonindigenous species (NIS). Although these fouling assemblages are clearly distinctive, the ecosystem functioning and species interactions taking place there are little understood. For instance, large predators may influence the fouling community development either directly (feeding on sessile fauna) or indirectly (feeding on small predators associated with these assemblages). In addition, by providing refuges, habitat complexity may modify the outcome of species interactions and the extent of biotic resistance (e.g., by increasing the abundance of niche‐specific competitors and predators of NIS). Using experimental settlement panels deployed in the field for 2.5 months, we tested the influence of predation (i.e., caging experiment), artificial structural complexity (i.e., mimics of turf‐forming species), and their interactions (i.e., refuge effects) on the development of sessile and mobile fauna in two marinas. In addition, we tested the role of biotic complexity—arising from the habitat‐forming species that grew on the panels during the trial—on the richness and abundance of mobile fauna. The effect of predation and artificial habitat complexity was negligible, regardless of assemblage status (i.e., native, cryptogenic, and nonindigenous). Conversely, habitat‐forming species and associated epibionts, responsible for biotic complexity, had a significant effect on mobile invertebrates (richness, abundance, and community structure). In particular, the richness and abundance of mobile NIS were positively affected by biotic complexity, with site‐dependent relationships. Altogether, our results indicate that biotic complexity prevails over artificial habitat complexity in determining the distribution of mobile species under low predation pressure. Facilitation of native and non‐native species thus seems to act upon diversity and community development: This process deserves further consideration in models of biotic resistance to invasion in urban marine habitats.

Highlights

  • Worldwide, coastal hardening is increasing as protection against environmental perturbations and to support the development of a diverse set of human activities

  • We investigated whether swimming predators influenced the early development of sessile and mobile fauna associated with floating pontoons in marinas

  • In addition to the effect of the initial artificial habitat complexity, we examined whether biotic complexity enhances the richness and abundance of mobile invertebrates

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Coastal hardening is increasing as protection against environmental perturbations (erosion, rising sea level, extreme storms, and flooding; Bulleri & Chapman, 2010; Firth et al, 2016) and to support the development of a diverse set of human activities (shipping, urban development, aquaculture, energy extraction, recreation). Adding artificial structures along natural shores is directly associated with habitat degradation, fragmentation, and loss, as well as alteration of connectivity and the local species pool (Bishop et al, 2017; Dafforn et al, 2015) These structures provide novel habitats for colonization by various species, but are not “surrogates” of the neighboring natural rocky reefs (e.g., Connell, 2001b; Fauvelot, Bertozzi, Costantini, Airoldi, & Abbiati, 2009). They generally support more abundant and diverse NIS than do fixed structures (Dafforn, 2017; Dafforn, Johnston, & Glasby, 2009; Glasby, Connell, Holloway, & Hewitt, 2007) Owing to their direct proximity and similarity to vessel hulls, floating pontoons are likely to act as important stepping stones involved in the spread of NIS at local scales. We were interested in examining the hypothesis that biotic complexity decreases the abundance or richness of NIS, possibly contributing to the biotic resistance to invasion

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.