Habitat and Landscape Suitability as Indicators of Bird Abundance in Created and Restored Wetlands

Jordan W Mora,John N Mager Iii,Douglas J Spieles

doi:10.5402/2011/297684

Jordan W Mora, John N Mager Iii + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/297684

Copy DOI

Abstract

We used aerial photography, field measurements, and bird surveys to evaluate 7 Ohio mitigation wetlands for their capacity to support avian guilds at both local and landscape scales. At the local scale, we assessed each wetland with habitat suitability indices (HSI) for eight wetland-dependent bird species as indicators for four guilds: wading, diving, dabbling, and emergent dependent. We characterized landscapes within 2.5 km of each wetland by measuring the buffer width, road density, connectedness, and anthropogenic land development. The changes in landscape variables over time were determined by comparison of aerial photos taken near the time of wetland construction and near the time of this study. Bird abundance data were poorly correlated with HSI scores but were well described with logistic models of buffer width, wetland area, and road density. Our results suggest that landscape variables are better predictors of bird abundance than HSI scores for these guilds in these wetlands.

Highlights

Habitat for wetland-dependent species in the United States has declined in quality and quantity over a long history of wetland drainage, filling, and impairment [1, 2]
National policies of mandatory mitigation have slowed the rate of wetland loss [2], and for the period of 1998–2004 Dahl [3] estimated a net gain in total wetland area for the first time
We test the use of habitat suitability indices (HSI) scores as predictors of bird abundance and find them to be ineffective

Summary

Introduction

Habitat for wetland-dependent species in the United States has declined in quality and quantity over a long history of wetland drainage, filling, and impairment [1, 2]. Through wetland creation and restoration the United States has achieved and exceeded the goal of no-netloss, but there continue to be questions about the ecological effectiveness of mitigation wetlands [4]. Many variables can influence the establishment of a diverse community or certain desirable species, and it is clear that biotic restoration is dependent on characteristics of the constructed ecosystem and on its placement within the landscape [5, 6]. The relative importance of local and landscape factors remains a central question in restoration ecology

Methods

Results

Conclusion