Abstract

BackgroundThe risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following the United States' 1976 swine flu vaccination campaign in the USA led to enhanced active surveillance during the pandemic influenza (A(H1N1)pdm09) immunization campaign. This study aimed to estimate the risk of GBS following influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination.MethodsA self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis was performed in Denmark, Finland, France, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Information was collected according to a common protocol and standardised procedures. Cases classified at levels 1–4a of the Brighton Collaboration case definition were included. The risk window was 42 days starting the day after vaccination. Conditional Poisson regression and pooled random effects models estimated adjusted relative incidences (RI). Pseudo likelihood and vaccinated-only methods addressed the potential contraindication for vaccination following GBS.ResultsThree hundred and three (303) GBS and Miller Fisher syndrome cases were included. Ninety-nine (99) were exposed to A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination, which was most frequently adjuvanted (Pandemrix and Focetria). The unadjusted pooled RI for A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and GBS was 3.5 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.2–5.5), based on all countries. This lowered to 2.0 (95% CI: 1.2–3.1) after adjustment for calendartime and to 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1–3.2) when we accounted for contra-indications. In a subset (Netherlands, Norway, and United Kingdom) we further adjusted for other confounders and there the RI decreased from 1.7 (adjusted for calendar month) to 1.4 (95% CI: 0.7–2.8), which is the main finding.ConclusionThis study illustrates the potential of conducting European collaborative vaccine safety studies. The main, fully adjusted analysis, showed that the RI of GBS was not significantly elevated after influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination (RI = 1.4 (95% CI: 0.7–2.8). Based on the upper limits of the pooled estimate we can rule out with 95% certainty that the number of excess GBS cases after influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination would be more than 3 per million vaccinated.

Highlights

  • During the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic, new monovalent adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines were introduced in Europe

  • A key safety concern identified in planning the pandemic vaccination campaigns was the potential association between Guillain-Barresyndrome (GBS) and influenza vaccines; this concern stemmed from an association observed in the USA in 1976 between swine flu vaccination and GBS [4]

  • In NL, NO, and the United Kingdom (UK) where further adjustment for infections, seasonal influenza vaccination, and other time dependent covariates was possible, the relative incidences (RI) for the association between influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and GBS decreased from the unadjusted pooled RI of 3.2 to 1.7 after adjustment for calendar month, and to 1.4 upon further adjustment for influenza-like illness (ILI), upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), and gastrointestinal infections (GI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic, new monovalent adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm vaccines were introduced in Europe. A key safety concern identified in planning the pandemic vaccination campaigns was the potential association between Guillain-Barresyndrome (GBS) and influenza vaccines; this concern stemmed from an association observed in the USA in 1976 between swine flu vaccination and GBS [4]. Subsequent prospective surveillance studies and retrospective epidemiological studies on seasonal influenza vaccines used in 1978, 1992, 1993, and beyond showed no or modest increases in the risk of GBS [5,6,7,8]. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended active monitoring of a potential association between the influenza A(H1N1)pdm vaccine and GBS. The risk of Guillain-Barresyndrome (GBS) following the United States’ 1976 swine flu vaccination campaign in the USA led to enhanced active surveillance during the pandemic influenza (A(H1N1)pdm09) immunization campaign. This study aimed to estimate the risk of GBS following influenza A(H1N1)pdm vaccination

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.