Abstract

Newly synthesized integral membrane proteins must traverse the aqueous cytosolic environment before arrival at their membrane destination and are prone to aggregation, misfolding, and mislocalization during this process. The biogenesis of integral membrane proteins therefore poses acute challenges to protein homeostasis within a cell and requires the action of effective molecular chaperones. Chaperones that mediate membrane protein targeting not only need to protect the nascent transmembrane domains from improper exposure in the cytosol, but also need to accurately select client proteins and actively guide their clients to the appropriate target membrane. The mechanisms by which cellular chaperones work together to coordinate this complex process are only beginning to be delineated. Here, we summarize recent advances in studies of the tail-anchored membrane protein targeting pathway, which revealed a network of chaperones, cochaperones, and targeting factors that together drive and regulate this essential process. This pathway is emerging as an excellent model system to decipher the mechanism by which molecular chaperones overcome the multiple challenges during post-translational membrane protein biogenesis and to gain insights into the functional organization of multicomponent chaperone networks.

Highlights

  • Synthesized integral membrane proteins must traverse the aqueous cytosolic environment before arrival at their membrane destination and are prone to aggregation, misfolding, and mislocalization during this process

  • The mechanism by which the cellular chaperone network overcomes these challenges during membrane protein biogenesis remains an outstanding question

  • This review will summarize recent advances in our understanding of the guided entry of tail-anchored protein (GET) pathway, with a focus on a hierarchical chaperone network found in this pathway

Read more

Summary

Improved client conformational quality via stepwise loading

What drives the directional substrate transfers in the GET pathway? Quantitative measurements suggested that both the Ssa1-to-Sgt and Sgt2-to-Get TA transfers are energetically downhill, with the transfer equilibrium ϳ100- and ϳ20-fold in favor of the downstream chaperone in the respective transfer complexes [23, 33]. Hsp binds client proteins rapidly in the ATP state (ϳ106 MϪ1 sϪ1 [39, 40]) and is far more abundant in the cytosol (ϳ15 ␮M) [37, 38] compared with Sgt and Get3 These factors enable cytosolic Hsp70s to more effectively compete with off-pathway misfolding and aggregation processes, allowing nascent TAs to be captured in a soluble, functionally competent conformation. The sequential substrate loading and transfers in the GET pathway are governed by a combination of thermodynamic forces and kinetic constraints, which together ensure that these hydrophobic proteins are maintained in a soluble, translocation-competent state en route to the ER membrane

Client privilege in the chaperone cascade
Findings
Client selection and triage
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call