Guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies of Siddha anthropometric tool Manikkadai Nool

Abstract

Background: Manikkadai-Nool (MK) is an ancient Siddha treatise of Anthropometric based predictions very much acclaimed for its diagnostic value in clinical practice. A well-set protocol is lacking for the methodology, limiting its expected outcome of predictive values. Moreover, the systematic approach of case reporting pertaining to its diagnostic accuracy studies (DAS) is showing many pitfalls. This purposes the induction of guidelines particular to MK that covers the entire aspects of case reporting. Materials and Methods: Available case reporting guidelines for Diagnostic studies (STARD guidelines) were overlooked to develop the core elements for DAS with 9 sections including 24 items. Discussion: The enlisted 24 items of Siddha Anthropometric Tool (SAT) guidelines have been depicted with examples that enable physicians and researchers to accomplish clinical reporting based on MK with much ease and accuracy. The guidelines may help peer reviewers for evaluating the concerning studies. Conclusion: SAT guidelines improve the quality of studies pertaining to MK that imprints the lead for further scientific acceptance. Further periodical up-gradation is warranted.