Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has published significant data and trends related to the national public health burden associated with trauma and injury. In the United States (U.S.), injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged 1–44 years. In 2008, approximately 30 million injuries resulted in an emergency department (ED) evaluation; 5.4 million (18%) of these patients were transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS).1 EMS providers determine the severity of injury and begin initial management at the scene. The decisions to transport injured patients to the appropriate hospital are made through a process known as “field triage.” Since 1986, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has provided guidance for the field triage process though its “Field Triage Decision Scheme.” In 2005, the CDC, with financial support from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), collaborated with ASC-COT to convene the initial meeting of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage (the Panel) to revise the decision scheme. This revised version was published in 2006 by ASC-COT, and in 2009 the CDC published a detailed description of the scientific rational for revising the field triage criteria entitled, “Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients.”2–3 In 2011, the CDC reconvened the Panel to review the 2006 Guidelines and recommend any needed changes. We present the methodology, findings and updated guidelines from the Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) from the 2011 Panel along with commentary on the burden of injury in the U.S., and the role emergency physicians have in impacting morbidity and mortality at the population level.

Highlights

  • Trauma and injury play a significant role in the disease burden suffered by the population

  • Findings and updated guidelines from the Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) from the 2011 Panel along with commentary on the burden of injury in the U.S, and the role emergency physicians have in impacting morbidity and mortality at the population level. [West J Emerg Med. 2013;14(1):69-76.]

  • The MMWR report described the dissemination and impact of the 2006 Guidelines, outlined the methodology used by the Panel for its 2011 review, explained the revisions and modifications of the 4 triage criteria, updated the schematic of the 2006 guidelines, and provided the rationale used by the Panel

Read more

Summary

Guidelines for Field Triage of Injuried Patients

The MMWR report described the dissemination and impact of the 2006 Guidelines, outlined the methodology used by the Panel for its 2011 review, explained the revisions and modifications of the 4 triage criteria (physiologic, anatomic, mechanism-of-injury, and special considerations), updated the schematic of the 2006 guidelines, and provided the rationale used by the Panel. They noted that the report is intended to help prehospital–care providers in their daily duties recognize individual injured patients who are most likely to benefit from specialized trauma center resources, and not intended as a mass casualty or disaster triage tool

BACKGROUND
Findings
METHODS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call