Abstract
High-quality data are critical to the entire scientific enterprise, yet the complexity and effort involved in data curation are vastly under-appreciated. This is especially true for large observational, clinical studies because of the amount of multimodal data that is captured and the opportunity for addressing numerous research questions through analysis, either alone or in combination with other data sets. However, a lack of details concerning data curation methods can result in unresolved questions about the robustness of the data, its utility for addressing specific research questions or hypotheses and how to interpret the results. We aimed to develop a framework for the design, documentation and reporting of data curation methods in order to advance the scientific rigour, reproducibility and analysis of the data. Forty-six experts participated in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on indicators of data curation that could be used in the design and reporting of studies. We identified 46 indicators that are applicable to the design, training/testing, run time and post-collection phases of studies. The Data Acquisition, Quality and Curation for Observational Research Designs (DAQCORD) Guidelines are the first comprehensive set of data quality indicators for large observational studies. They were developed around the needs of neuroscience projects, but we believe they are relevant and generalisable, in whole or in part, to other fields of health research, and also to smaller observational studies and preclinical research. The DAQCORD Guidelines provide a framework for achieving high-quality data; a cornerstone of health research.
Highlights
Observational studies are a crucial part of the biomedical research armamentarium, when studying complex conditions or the related problem of understanding the outcomes of interventions in highly heterogeneous real-world populations [1]
We formed a Steering Committee consisting of seven individuals with professional backgrounds in informatics and data management and/or experience in data curation/data set design in large-scale observational studies
The Delphi process converged on 46 items after 3 rounds that were judged to be indicators of data quality
Summary
Observational studies are a crucial part of the biomedical research armamentarium, when studying complex conditions or the related problem of understanding the outcomes of interventions in highly heterogeneous real-world populations [1]. A recent comparative effectiveness study in traumatic brain injury [2] was designed to prospectively acquire demographic, longitudinal clinical intervention, outcome, biomarker, ‘omics, imaging and waveform data in 5400 patients in 3 strata from multiple sites in 22 countries This data set alone comprises more than 2500 discrete data concepts, but in addition, it is designed to be compatible with data from sister studies in the USA, Australia, India and China. High-quality data are critical to the entire scientific enterprise, yet the complexity and effort involved in data curation are vastly under-appreciated This is especially true for large observational, clinical studies because of the amount of multimodal data that is captured and the opportunity for addressing numerous research questions through analysis, either alone or in combination with other data sets. The DAQCORD Guidelines provide a framework for achieving high-quality data; a cornerstone of health research
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
