Abstract
For head-on or head-pursuit engagement,angle control proportional navigation( ACPN) and angle control retro-proportional navigation( ACRPN) closed-form trajectory shaping guidance law with impact angular constraints were proposed,which were based on proportional navigation( PN) or retro-proportional navigation( RPN) guidance law. ACPN with positive navigation ratio intercepted targets in head-on engagement,whose advantages were using less control efforts and final acceleration. ACRPN with negative navigation ratio intercepted targets in head-pursuit engagement. ACRPN's control efforts,miss distance and impact angle error were much less than that of guidance law in head-on engagement. Simulations demonstrate these claims mentioned above. Besides,the capture regions of ACPN and ACRPN for interception of high-speed targets are analyzed,which indicates that ACPN's capture region is larger than that of bias PN. Moreover,ACPN should be used to intercept targets in head-on engagement when the gimbal angle is less than sum of initial line-ofsight angle and 90°,and ACRPN should be used in head-pursuit engagement for the gimbal angle is equal to or greater than sum of initial line-of-sight angle and 90°.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
