Guest Editors' Introduction to the Special Section from the International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution

Abstract

SOFTWARE maintenance and evolution are relevant to users, engineers, and researchers who come into contact with software beyond Version 1. The International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSM) is the premiere forum for software maintenance researchers and practitioners to examine, discuss, and exchange ideas regarding the key issues facing the software maintenance community. During the conference, participants from academia, government, and industry share ideas and experiences solving critical software maintenance problems. ICSM 2006 was held in Philadelphia on 24-27 September 2006 in cooperation with several colocated workshops. These included the Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution (WSE), the Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM), the Second International IEEE Workshop on Software Evolvability, and the Second International Workshop on Predictive Models of Modern Industrial Software Engineering. ICSM 2006’s technical program was anchored by 45 papers selected from 147 submissions. The program also included keynote addresses from three distinguished speakers: Patrick Lardieri, David Notkin, and Richard Stallman. Of the 45 papers, seven were invited to this special issue with five passing the rigorous TSE review process. These five selected papers include two that discuss frameworks and three that present new techniques. The frameworks support the creation of language-independent program analyses and evolvable test suites. Two of the techniques consider source-code reengineering and the final one the challenging problem of making live updates to a software system while it is running. The first of the two framework papers, “An Extensible Metamodel for Program Analysis” by D. Strein, R. Lincke, J. Lundberg, and W. Lowe, describes a language-independent framework for building new analyses. The resulting architecture supports the construction of specific analyses (e.g., refactorings) and is easily extensible through the addition of new front ends to support new languages. This flexibility and the use of loose coupling between components of the existing framework support the easy integration of new components. The paper uses the implementation of the tools VIZZANALYZER and XDEVELOP as a proof of concept. Looking forward, further work includes empirical study (e.g., considering running time and memory consumption) and the incorporation of dynamic analysis into the framework (e.g., to support debuggers and profilers). This paper was published in the September 2007 issue of TSE; however, the abstract of this paper is included in this special section. The paper can be found in the Computer Society Digital Library at http://computer.org/tse/ archives.htm. In the second framework paper, “On the Detection of Test Smells: A Metrics-Based Approach for General Fixture and Eager Test” by B. Van Rompaey, B. Du Bois, S. Demeyer, and M. Rieger, a framework for evaluating the evolvability of white box tests suites alongside the program is presented. The goal of this approach is to avoid the (often significant) cost incurred when test cases must be coevolved with the program. The framework accomplishes this by describing a collection of test smells. Akin to code smells, test smells allow the concrete expression of what a good evolvable test is by exploiting the principles that underlie white box testing. The paper proposes a formal description of test smells by means of metric predictors, empirically evaluated for two example test smells. Looking forward, future work will consider the interplay between test smells and frequently changing test cases. Understanding how test smells emerge and grow should help in proactively detecting current and future smells. The third and fourth papers address reengineering, a problem into which significant software evolution energy is invested. The first of these two papers, “API-Evolution Support with Diff-CatchUp” by Z. Xing and E. Stroulia, addresses the API evolution problem. In short, reusable components, and thus their APIs, must evolve in response to client needs for improved functionality, quality, and generality. Applications using an API which evolve independently can thus “break.” To tackle the API-evolution problem, the paper presents a technique and a tool that automatically recognizes API changes in a reused component and proposes plausible fixes based on working examples of the framework code base. Looking forward, planned extensions to the work IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL. 33, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2007 797