Abstract
This review argues that there are two incompatible lines of argumentin Niels Grønkjær’s interesting book on Den nye Gud [The New God: After Fundamentalism and Atheism]. The first line suggests a purely temporal understanding of the Trinity: The Father gives up his power, then both Son and Father die on the cross, while only the Spirit persists in the human community of love. The second line of thought represents an Augustinian model of Trinity, reformulated via Hegel. It seems that only the second line can fulfill the author’s intentions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
