Abstract

This article expands on the understanding of the role civil society organisations (CSOs) play in counteracting right‐wing extremism. Drawing on central strands in the defending democracy literature, this article introduces a typology to classify the responses of CSOs to right‐wing extremism. The typology takes into account the distinction between tolerance and intolerance on the one hand, and active and passive political participation on the other. What is more, it allows for a more fine‐tuned analysis of a variety of CSO responses vis‐à‐vis extreme right‐wing movements. This distinction is important as it allows for a better understanding of the democratic role of civil society in general and the responses of pro‐democratic civil society to political extremism in particular. Using this typology as a point of departure, the article contributes empirically by exploring how local CSOs in the Swedish town of Ludvika responded to the foremost neo‐Nazi movement in the Nordic countries, namely the Nordic Resistance Movement (NRM), prior to the 2018 Swedish election. Drawing primarily on the perspective of civil society leaders, the findings show that local CSOs are generally intolerant of the NRM and have engaged in opposition to the movement. Notably, responses tend to be more oriented towards promoting dialogue and the importance of public discussion in civil society rather than using confrontational tactics such as protests and civil disobedience. The article concludes that CSOs serve as bulwarks against right‐wing extremism at least during politically charged situations; however, differences in tolerance and political participation indicate that CSOs respond differently to right‐wing extremism.

Highlights

  • Over recent decades, the upsurge in right-wing extremism has represented one of the most dramatic developments in many Western democracies

  • Taken together, the results indicate that CSOs are intolerant of the NRM

  • The results indicate that political organisations and citizen groups tend to be more active in terms of involvement in political activities directed at the NRM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The upsurge in right-wing extremism has represented one of the most dramatic developments in many Western democracies. Scholars warned that the impact of the coronavirus pandemic has increased opportunity for leaders and. A central discussion revolves around how democratic actors respond to the increasing activities of right-wing extremists and the fundamental question on tolerance of the intolerant – that is, how to deal with movements that are not against democracy per se but that are at odds with liberal democracy. The discussion centres on the way democratic rulers respond to political extremism – for example, the role of anti-extremist legislation and the various forms of collaboration with populist parties (Widfeldt 2004; Capoccia 2005; Kaltwasser & Taggart 2016; Malkopoulou & Norman 2018)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call