Abstract
It is well-known that linear quadratic regulators (LQR) enjoy guaranteed stability margins, whereas linear quadratic Gaussian regulators (LQG) do not. In this letter, we consider systems and compensators defined over directed acyclic graphs. In particular, there are multiple decision-makers, each with access to a different part of the global state. In this setting, the optimal LQR compensator is dynamic, similar to classical LQG. We show that when sub-controller input costs are decoupled (but there is possible coupling between sub-controller state costs), the decentralized LQR compensator enjoys similar guaranteed stability margins to classical LQR. However, these guarantees disappear when cost coupling is introduced.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
