Abstract

During nutrient deprivation, the bacterial cell undergoes a stress response known as the stringent response. This response is characterized by induction of the nucleotide derivative guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) that dramatically modulates the cell’s transcriptome. In Escherichia coli, ppGpp regulates transcription of as many as 750 genes within 5 min of induction by binding directly to RNA polymerase (RNAP) at two sites ~60 Å apart. One proposal for the presence of two sites is that they have different affinities for ppGpp, expanding the dynamic range over which ppGpp acts. We show here, primarily using the Differential Radial Capillary Action of Ligand Assay (DRaCALA), that ppGpp has a similar affinity for each site, contradicting the proposal. Because the ppGpp binding sites are formed by interactions of the β’ subunit of RNAP with two small protein factors, the ω subunit of RNAP which contributes to Site 1 and the transcription factor DksA which contributes to Site 2, variation in the concentrations of ω or DksA potentially could differentially regulate ppGpp occupancy of the two sites. It was shown previously that DksA varies little at different growth rates or growth phases, but little is known about variation of the ω concentration. Therefore, we raised an anti-ω antibody and performed Western blots at different times in growth and during a stringent response. We show here that ω, like DksA, changes little with growth conditions. Together, our data suggest that the two ppGpp binding sites fill in parallel, and occupancy with changing nutritional conditions is determined by variation in the ppGpp concentration, not by variation in ω or DksA.

Highlights

  • When nutritional resources change, cells adjust their transcriptional output to match the new environment

  • Our previous studies evaluated the relative roles of Sites 1 and 2 on the transcriptional effects of ppGpp, an indirect indicator of ppGpp binding to RNA polymerase (RNAP) (Ross et al, 2013, 2016)

  • These experiments showed that Site 2 had a much larger effect on both inhibition and activation than Site 1, even though the concentration of ppGpp needed for half-maximal effects on transcription appeared similar, ~12–21 μM for Site 1 at saturating ω and ~19 μM for Site 2 at nearly saturating DksA (Ross et al, 2013, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cells adjust their transcriptional output to match the new environment. In proteobacteria like Escherichia coli, the basal level of ppGpp (from ~1 to 10 μM) only moderately affects gene expression, but induction of RelA in response ppGpp Binding to RNA Polymerase to the accumulation of deacylated tRNA(s) increases the ppGpp concentration 100–1,000-fold, dramatically changing gene expression (Ryals et al, 1982; Varik et al, 2017) In this so-called stringent response, transcription of hundreds of genes, many of which are related to translation, is inhibited within 5 min of ppGpp induction, and transcription of hundreds of other genes, many of which are related to pathways involved in amino acid biosynthesis, is stimulated (Durfee et al, 2008; Traxler et al, 2008; Sanchez-Vazquez et al, 2019). A strain lacking rpoZ, the gene encoding the RNAP ω subunit, (i.e., lacking Site 1) displays a modest lag in recovering from a downshift from a rich to a minimal medium (Gentry et al, 1991; Ross et al, 2013, 2016), while strains lacking dksA have more pronounced defects in recovery from a downshift and in transcriptional regulation by ppGpp (Paul et al, 2004; Ross et al, 2016; Sanchez-Vazquez et al, 2019)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call