Abstract

In previous placebo-controlled studies, guanabenz was shown to be a safe and effective antihypertensive drug without acute effects on cardiac function. In view of its therapeutic advantages, a double-blind comparison of guanabenz with methyldopa was performed in a group of 36 patients over 6 mo. Both drugs produced statistically and clinically significant decreases in blood pressure with similar side effects. No laboratory or electrocardiographic abnormalities were found other than positive Coombs' tests which developed in 3 patients during methyldopa therapy. Cardiac performance in 26 of the patients, as measured by noninvasive techniques, showed no significant changes from either drug except for a progressive and statistically significant increase in systolic time interval (QS2) and the ratio of the pre-ejection period to left ventricular ejection time (PEP/LVET) during methyldopa therapy. For an additional 6 mo, continued efficacy and safety were shown under open conditions in those patients who had received guanabenz. The study suggests that guanabenz may be an important new antihypertensive drug because of effectiveness, absence of adverse cardiac effects, and paucity of side effects.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call