Abstract
The Brazil nut tree (Bertholletia excelsa) is an iconic and economically valuable species that dominates vast swathes of the Amazon Basin. This species seems to have been an important part of human subsistence strategies in the region from at least the Early Holocene, and its current distribution may be a legacy of past human settlement. Because B. excelsa is a long-lived pioneer tree it requires natural or human disturbances to increase light availability in the understory for a successful establishment. However, it remains unclear how the long-term population dynamics of this species have been shaped by pre-colonial and post-colonial human practices. Here, we use tree-ring analyses to look at changes in growing conditions over the past 400 years in a Brazil nut tree population in Central Amazonia. We identify changes in tree recruitment and growth rates associated not only with regional climatic variability, but also major political and socio-economic activities recorded by historical documents in the vicinity of Manaus. We demonstrate that the expansion of a post-colonial political center (Manaus) from the middle of the 18th century onwards coincided with a reduction in recruitment of B. excelsa. We argue that this hiatus suggests the interruption of indigenous management practices, probably due to the collapse of pre-Columbian societies. A second recruitment pulse, and unprecedented cycles of growth release and suppression, aligns with a shift to modern exploitation of the forest into the 20th century. Our findings shed light on how past histories of human-forest interactions can be revealed by the growth rings of trees in Amazonia. Future interdisciplinary analysis of these trees should enable more detailed investigation of how human forest management has changed in this part of the world, through pre-colonial, colonial, and industrial periods of human activity, with potential implications for conservation.
Highlights
The Amazon Basin has provided a crucial window into the long-neglected extent of preColumbian human occupation and manipulation of tropical forest environments [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
Based on our analyses of more than three centuries of Amazon nut tree population dynamics, we suggest that this emblematic and highly useful tree species has been intimately connected with humans through forest management practices
We observe that fluctuations in tree recruitment coincide with periods of human occupation, and that a hiatus in tree establishment suggests the impact of political changes that led indigenous populations to abandon the forest and their management practices
Summary
The Amazon Basin has provided a crucial window into the long-neglected extent of preColumbian human occupation and manipulation of tropical forest environments [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. While much attention has been focused on the cultivation of ‘crops’ in a traditional sense–including manioc, chili peppers, peanuts, squash, and maize [3, 7, 10]–trees have remained somewhat neglected in archaeological and historical studies of past human land management in the Neotropics. This is significant because many economically important trees dominate modern Amazonian forests, and some of these have undergone domestication processes [1, 12]. Understanding the changes in forest management witnessed by Amazonian forests over the course of the last four centuries has significant implications for ongoing human interaction with these threatened ecosystems
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
