Abstract
In spite of its importance, the growth of welfare and its distribution is an underresearched topic. The usual focus is income, an intermediate product of economic activity, while welfare is the final product. Although results depend crucially on the price index used, it becomes obvious that welfare growth was substantially slower than income growth and that the middle-class quintiles fared worse. The welfare of the top 1% grew three to four times as fast as that of the 3rd quintile. With an interdependent utility function using the 5th quintile as reference, only the top quintile experienced positive welfare gains.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
