Abstract
We re-analyze the nonlocal gravity model of Deser and Woodard which was proposed to account for the current phase of cosmic acceleration. We show that the growth of perturbations predicted by this nonlocal gravity model when its background evolution is fixed by some particular non-$\Lambda$CDM models can be substantially lower than when its background is fixed by $\Lambda$CDM. This can be seen when we consider the background expansion by a dark energy model with a slightly less negative equation of state with respect to cosmological constant. Our results hints towards a fact that the choice of the background expansion can play a crucial role how this nonlocal gravity model can fit the growth history data. While the growth data might show better consistency to GR models (among the background models we studied so far), it seems the nonlocal gravity model studied in this work is able to show comparable consistency to the growth data as well. Showing this consistency can be considered as a significant result since this model can stand as a distinguishable alternative to the standard model of cosmology.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.