Abstract

This article examines empirically the secular growth of federal government expenditure in Canada using both political and economic variables. The alternative hypotheses and related controversies surrounding the measurement of the size and growth of government are discussed and tested. The results indicate that, at least in the case of Canada, the use of real or nominal measures does not alter the conclusions. However, depending on whether exhaustive or nonexhaustive measures of the size of government are used, significantly different results are obtained. Our empirical results suggest that both political and economic factors have significantly affected the growth of government in Canada. Among economic variables, internationally induced economic changes, dependency ratio, rate of unemployment and the growth in real income stand out. Political variables support the hypothesis that the more “liberal” the leader of the party in power and the higher the percentage of liberals in the House, the larger will be the size of public spending, and vice versa.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.