Abstract

Growth parameters such as seedling germination attributes, crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR),net assimilation rate (NAR) and leaf area ratio (LAR) as well as yield parameters were investigated in six maizecultivars representing two era of maize breeding in Nigeria during the 2005 late and 2006 early cropping seasons.Differences between maize breeding era were significant for seedling emergence (E %) and emergence index (EI)while genotypes within a particular breeding era (G/E) differed significantly for E% and emergence rate index(ERI). Seasonal (S) variation in seedling parameters was also significant for E % and ERI with a 15% higherseedling emergence in 2006 early season. CGR in the genotypes in breeding era 1 was higher by seven percent(7%) during vegetative growth phase but lower by 14% at flowering phase compared to genotypes in breedingera 2. NAR on the other hand was consistently higher in varieties developed in 1970’s by 15.2 and 13.8%compared to varieties developed in 1990’s. Regardless of the breeding era, varieties with higher values for LARat flowering (except var. TZPB-SR) were higher yielding than those with lower LAR. Overall, varietiesdeveloped in era 2 were superior to those developed in era 1 for E% and also had six percent (6%) higher valuesfor LAR at vegetative growth phase than those developed in era 1 but decreased by two percent (2%) atflowering phase. E% in the genotypes ranged from 48.56 in ACR 9943 DMRSR to 79.33 in ACR99TZLCOMP4 DMRSR, while EI and ERI ranged from 0.86 and 0.010 in TZB-SR to 0.96 and 0.014 in ACR 97 TZLCOMP1-W. Grain yield was significantly higher in 2006 early cropping season by 0.3t/ha-1 translating to14.78% than in late season and it ranged from 1.64t/ha-1 in TZPB-SR (era 1) to 2.94t/ha-1 inACR99TZLCOMP4DMRSR (era 2). Var. ACR99TZL COMP4DMRSR with the lowest values for CGR, RGRand NAR at vegetative phase had the highest grain yield (2.94t/ha-1) indicating that genotypic superiority forgrain yield is not particularly related to differences in any of these traits but rather dependent on the inherentgenetic potential of the varieties themselves.

Highlights

  • Maize improvement for grain yield potential, stability of yield including plant and grain characteristics have gone through several stages in Nigeria since 1950

  • Seasonal (S) variation was significant for emergence percentage (E %) and emergence rate index (ERI) but not for emergence index (EI) which is a measure of speed of emergence (Table 1)

  • Higher values recorded for crop growth rate (CGR) which is the accumulation of dry matter per day in 2005 late season compared to 2006 early season was probably due to better insolation and lower incidence of biotic stress factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maize improvement for grain yield potential, stability of yield including plant and grain characteristics have gone through several stages in Nigeria since 1950. The breeding efforts which began with the introgression of genes for pest and disease resistance (Fajemisin, 1985; Fakorede et al, 1993; 2001) to the development of maize genotypes (open pollinated varieties and hybrids) with high grain yield potential (Kim et al, 1993) as well as adaptation to different ecologies and stress factors (Kim, 1997), have resulted in the development and release of productive maize varieties for different agro-ecologies in Nigeria. Introduction of high yielding open pollinated varieties (OPVs) and hybrids into the Nigeria’s savanna between 1985 and 1990 resulted in further yield increase ranging from 4.25t/ha-1 to 5.15t/ha-1, representing an average of 22% yield advantage especially for the hybrids (Kim et al, 1993). Maize grain yield since has witnessed a phenomena increase as high as 14.7t/ha-1 in high yielding environments of the West and Central Africa (WCA) representing 20 to 40% yield advantage (Kim, 1997). In a recent study which compared the performance of maize OPVs developed for WCA between 1970 and 1999 across the West African savannas, Kamara et al, (2004) reported genetic gain in grain yield of 0·41% per year-1

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call