Abstract

While most efforts to combat climate change are focussed on energy efficiency and substitution of fossil fuels, growth in the built environment remains largely unquestioned. Given the current climate emergency and increasing scarcity of global resources, it is imperative that we address this ‘blind spot’ by finding ways to support required services with less resource consumption.There is now long overdue recognition to greenhouse gas emissions ‘embodied’ in the production of building materials and construction, and its importance in reaching targets of net zero carbon by 2050. However, there is a widespread belief that we can continue to ‘build big’, provided we incorporate energy saving measures and select ‘low carbon materials’ − ignoring the fact that excessive volume and area of buildings may outweigh any carbon savings. This is especially the case with commercial real estate.As the inception and planning phases of projects offer most potential for reduction in both operational and embodied carbon, we must turn our attention to previously overlooked options such as ‘build nothing’ or ‘build less’. This involves challenging the root cause of the need, exploring alternative approaches to meet desired outcomes, and maximising the use of existing assets. If new build is required, this should be designed for adaptability, with increased stewardship, so the building stock of the future will be a more valuable and useable resource.This points to the need for increased understanding and application of the principles of strategic asset management, hitherto largely ignored in sustainability circles, which emphasize a close alignment of assets with the services they support.Arguably, as the built environment consumes more material resources and energy than any other sector, its future configuration may be critical to the future of people and the planet. In this regard, this paper seeks to break new ground for deeper exploration.

Highlights

  • While most efforts to combat climate change are focussed on energy efficiency and substitution of fossil fuels, growth in the built environment remains largely unquestioned

  • This points to the need for increased understanding and application of the principles of strategic asset management, hitherto largely ignored in sustainability circles, which emphasize a close alignment of assets with the services they support

  • The stock of infrastructure is expected to double shortly after 2030, largely due to the pressing needs of the global south (NCE, 2018), this paper focuses upon buildings and especially Commercial real estate (CRE) – where current trends are especially extravagant and wasteful

Read more

Summary

24 Jan 2020 report report report

4) recognised that growth in demand for new building stock and investment in refurbishment, together with infrastructure development, “have a significant impact on capital carbon”; they argued this should be addressed in tandem with operational carbon They were among the first to highlight that the early planning and design phases of a project offer most potential for embodied or capital carbon reduction. The more labour-intensive maintenance, adaptation and refurbishment of existing building stocks is a better employment generator than new construction (Kincaid, 2002), while asset and facilities management can create longer-term jobs in the services sector This new agenda could be set within the wider framework of ‘ecological economics’, where economic growth is seen as a means of achieving the ends of socio-ecological transformation – a vision of prosperity based on much less material abundance and consumption, with alternative pathways to well-being (Kallis et al, 2012).

C40 Cities
Findings
Foster J: Capitalism and Degrowth
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call