Abstract

Abstract We used tagging data for 760 recaptured Kootenai River white sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus that had been at large for as long as 23 years to examine the validity of ages assigned from pectoral fin rays. Growth estimates from tagged white sturgeon in the Kootenai River indicated that age estimates from fin rays were underestimates of the true ages. Bias was estimated from growth differences between length-at-age relationships derived from fin ray ages and recaptures of tagged fish. Growth of tagged fish was substantially less than predicted from fin ray length-at-age curves. Age-specific lengths estimated from fin rays cannot be achieved at the growth increments observed for tagged fish. Ages estimated from fin rays were 30–60% less than the apparent ages from tagging data. Thus, actual ages may be 1.5–2.0 times the ages estimated from fin rays. Apparent aging bias will result in substantial changes in population parameters estimated from age, including growth, mortality, longevity, and year-cl...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.