Abstract

Coccolithophores are key components of phytoplankton communities, exerting a critical impact on the global carbon cycle and the Earth’s climate through the production of coccoliths made of calcium carbonate (calcite) and bioactive gases. Microzooplankton grazing is an important mortality factor in coccolithophore blooms, however little is currently known regarding the mortality (or growth) rates within non-bloom populations. Measurements of coccolithophore calcite production (CP) and dilution experiments to determine microzooplankton (≤63 µm) grazing rates were made during a spring cruise (April 2015) at the Central Celtic Sea (CCS), shelf edge (CS2), and within an adjacent April bloom of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi at station J2.CP at CCS ranged from 10.4 to 40.4 µmol C m−3 d−1 and peaked at the height of the spring phytoplankton bloom (peak chlorophyll-a concentrations ∼6 mg m−3). Cell normalised calcification rates declined from ∼1.7 to ∼0.2 pmol C cell−1 d−1, accompanied by a shift from a mixed coccolithophore species community to one dominated by the more lightly calcified species E. huxleyi and Calciopappus caudatus. At the CCS, coccolithophore abundance increased from 6 to 94 cells mL−1, with net growth rates ranging from 0.06 to 0.21 d−1 from the 4th to the 28th April. Estimates of intrinsic growth and grazing rates from dilution experiments, at the CCS ranged from 0.01 to 0.86 d−1 and from 0.01 to 1.32 d−1, respectively, which resulted in variable net growth rates during April. Microzooplankton grazers consumed 59 to >100% of daily calcite production at the CCS. Within the E. huxleyi bloom a maximum density of 1986 cells mL−1 was recorded, along with CP rates of 6000 µmol C m−3 d−1 and an intrinsic growth rate of 0.29 d−1, with ∼80% of daily calcite production being consumed.Our results show that microzooplankton can exert strong top-down control on both bloom and non-bloom coccolithophore populations, grazing over 60% of daily growth (and calcite production). The fate of consumed calcite is unclear, but may be lost either through dissolution in acidic food vacuoles, and subsequent release as CO2, or export to the seabed after incorporation into small faecal pellets. With such high microzooplankton-mediated mortality losses, the fate of grazed calcite is clearly a high priority research direction.

Highlights

  • Coccolithophores are a diverse and biogeochemically important group of marine phytoplankton which contribute towards the marine carbon cycle through the production and subsequent export of cellular scales formed of calcium carbonate

  • Hydrographic conditions varied during spring at Celtic Sea (CCS), with sea surface temperature varying from 9.8 °C to 11.2 °C and mixed layer depth (MLD) shoaling from 51 m at the beginning of April to 16 m by the end of the month

  • This highlights that the biogeochemical importance of coccolithophores during non-bloom conditions does not relate to their organic carbon production (PP), but rather to their inorganic carbon production (CP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coccolithophores are a diverse and biogeochemically important group of marine phytoplankton which contribute towards the marine carbon cycle through the production and subsequent export of cellular scales (coccoliths) formed of calcium carbonate (calcite). Phytoplankton blooms are common in shelf sea environments during late spring, when environmental conditions allow growth to exceed mortality and biomass to accumulate. Satellitederived particulate inorganic calcite and chlorophyll-a data from open ocean regions suggest that blooms of coccolithophores can cooccur with blooms of other phytoplankton (e.g. diatoms), and sequential succession between groups may not always occur (Hopkins et al, 2015). In situ observations made during several phytoplankton blooms support the co-occurrence of coccolithophores with other groups, including diatoms and dinoflagellates in both open ocean and coastal environments (see Daniels et al, 2015; Poulton et al, 2013, 2014; Schiebel et al, 2011), we currently lack in situ data from shelf sea environments during spring

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call