Abstract

1. The dihedral subgroup is non-abelian. If a group G has the property that the squares of its operators constitute a given group then the direct product of G and any abelian group of order 2m and of type (1, 1, 1, * ) has the same property. Such direct products will always be excluded in what follows. It has been noted that a necessary and sufficient condition that there is at least one group G which has the property that the squares of its operators constitute a given non-abelian dihedral group H is that the order h of H is not divisible by 8 and that every odd prime number which divides h is congruent to unity modulo 4.t To determine the number of these groups when h is given and satisfies these conditions we let n represent the number of the different prime numbers which divide h. Since the cyclic subgroup K of index 2 contained in H is the direct product of its Sylow subgroups and all the groups of isomorphisms of these Sylow subgroups are cyclic it results that when h is twice an odd number there is one and only one group of order h 2n-2 which satisfies the condition that the squares of its operators constitute K. The given group of order hk 2n-2 is the largest group which has the property that the squares of its operators constitute K when h is twice an odd number, as will be assumed until the contrary is explicitly stated. It is merely the direct product of n-1 dihedral groups, each of order twice the power of an odd prime. The commutator subgroup of every G is K and the corresponding quotient group is the abelian group of type (2, 1, 1, * * ). This results directly from the fact that if two operators of G have squares which are contained in K then the square of their product is also contained therein since this square could not be an operator of order 2 in H in view of the fact that this product could not transform this cyclic subgroup according to an operator of order 4. It should be emphasized that an operator of G which transforms some of the operators of the cyclic subgroup of index 2 in H according to an operator of order 2 does not necessarily transform all the operators of this subgroup, besides the identity, according to such an operator, but that every operator

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call