Abstract
Abstract Groups consist of collections of individuals who act and take decisions together. They are hugely important in economic and social activity, encompassing governments, firms, local organizations and families. Yet much of neo‐classical economics ignores them, focusing on individuals, or treating groups as quasi‐individuals. This paper classifies alternative modes of operation of groups and considers some empirical cases, exploring why some groups help improve incomes and distribution while others are unproductive. It is argued that a trust/reciprocity mode of operation tends to be associated with “good” group behaviour. The mode of operation of particular groups is conditioned by individual motivation and social pressures; these are both dependent on historical circumstances, including the degree of equity within the community and prevalent incentives, constraints and philosophy. A crude market philosophy can encourage individual short‐term maximizing behaviour, undermining good group behaviour. In...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
