Abstract

Output interference is a source of forgetting induced by recalling. We investigated how grouping influences output interference in short-term memory. In Experiment 1, the participants were asked to remember four colored items. Those items were grouped by temporal coincidence as well as spatial alignment: two items were presented in the first memory array and two were presented in the second, and the items in both arrays were either vertically or horizontally aligned as well. The participants then performed two recall tasks in sequence by selecting a color presented at a cued location from a color wheel. In the same-group condition, the participants reported both items from the same memory array; however, in the different-group condition, the participants reported one item from each memory array. We analyzed participant responses with a mixture model, which yielded two measures: guess rate and precision of recalled memories. The guess rate in the second recall was higher for the different-group condition than for the same-group condition; however, the memory precisions obtained for both conditions were similarly degraded in the second recall. In Experiment 2, we varied the probability of the same- and different-group conditions with a ratio of 3 to 7. We expected output interference to be higher in the same-group condition than in the different-group condition. This is because items of the other group are more likely to be probed in the second recall phase and, thus, protecting those items during the first recall phase leads to a better performance. Nevertheless, the same pattern of results was robustly reproduced, suggesting grouping shields the grouped items from output interference because of the secured accessibility. We discussed how grouping influences output interference.

Highlights

  • Output interference is a type of forgetting induced by recalling (Tulving and Arbuckle, 1966; Roediger, 1974; Nickerson, 1984; Anderson et al, 1994)

  • The standard deviation σ was lower if the item belonged to the second memory array (20.75 ± 3.70◦) than the first one (22.88 ± 3.39◦) and the difference was significant [t(19) = 2.78, p = 0.012]

  • We performed pairwise comparisons of means with Tukey contrasts, in which the p-values were adjusted using the Holm-Bonferroni correction method. The results of these tests indicated that the retrieval condition effect was driven by the difference between the first and second recalls, while the same- and differentgroup conditions were similar

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Output interference is a type of forgetting induced by recalling (Tulving and Arbuckle, 1966; Roediger, 1974; Nickerson, 1984; Anderson et al, 1994). One of the earliest studies of the output interference was conducted by Tulving and Arbuckle (1966), who asked their participants to remember a list of word and number pairs. They provided a word cue to aid in the recall of the paired number.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call