Abstract

As one of the most classic gestalt phenomena, grouping is often considered to occur preattentively. Therefore, it seems natural to expect conflicting grouping cues to combine preattentively and to lead to an impression of "no grouping." On the other hand, a recent account suggests that grouping by similarity is mediated by the attentional selection of a feature. This account makes the distinctive prediction that for grouping by similarity, but not for low-level groupings (e.g., connectedness, common region), when two conflicting grouping cues are present, the grouping structure will tend to be driven either by one type of cue or by the other type of cue and will usually not lead to the impression of "no grouping." This predicted pattern of results was confirmed in the present study: the presence of two conflicting low-level grouping cues led to reports of "no grouping" in 73.0 % of the trials, but for two similarity grouping cues, "no grouping" was only reported in 25.5 % of the trials. In summary, although low-level grouping cues do indeed work together to determine the perceptual structure preattentively, grouping by similarity is likely mediated by the attentional selection of a feature.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.