Group Size, Memory, and Interaction Rate in the Evolution of Cooperation

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessReportGroup Size, Memory, and Interaction Rate in the Evolution of Cooperation1S. J. Cox, T. J. Slockin, and J. SteeleS. J. CoxDepartment of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ Search for more articles by this author , T. J. SlockinFaculty of Mathematical Studies, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ Search for more articles by this author , and J. SteeleDepartment of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England. Search for more articles by this author Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJFaculty of Mathematical Studies, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJDepartment of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England.PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 40, Number 3June 1999 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/200027 Views: 55Total views on this site Citations: 19Citations are reported from Crossref History © 1999 by The Wenner‐Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reservedPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Sourav Rana, Ayanendranath Basu, Sinchan Ghosh, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya Moths exhibit strong memory among cooperative species of other taxonomic groups: An empirical study, Ecological Modelling 476 (Feb 2023): 110235.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110235Penny Spikins, Jennifer C. French, Seren John-Wood, Calvin Dytham Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Ecological Changes, Social Behaviour and Human Intergroup Tolerance 300,000 to 30,000 BP, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 28, no.11 (Feb 2021): 53–75.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09503-5Monika Baumanova Pillar Tombs and the City: Creating a Sense of Shared Identity in Swahili Urban Space, Archaeologies 14, no.33 (Apr 2018): 377–411.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-018-9338-xJeffrey R. Stevens, Jan K. Woike, Lael J. Schooler, Stefan Lindner, Thorsten Pachur Social contact patterns can buffer costs of forgetting in the evolution of cooperation, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285, no.18801880 (Jun 2018): 20180407.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0407Ana Pitchon Large-Scale Aquaculture and Coastal Resource-Dependent Communities: Tradition in Transition on Chiloe Island, Chile, The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 20, no.22 (Jul 2015): 343–358.https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12151Fernando Fagundes Ferreira, Paulo R. A. Campos Multilevel selection in a resource-based model, Physical Review E 88, no.11 (Jul 2013).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.014101Gergely Horváth, Jaromír Kovářík, Friederike Mengel Limited memory can be beneficial for the evolution of cooperation, Journal of Theoretical Biology 300 (May 2012): 193–205.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.01.034C. Athena Aktipis Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple Walk Away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups, Evolution and Human Behavior 32, no.44 (Jul 2011): 263–276.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.01.002C. Athena Aktipis, Eduardo Fernandez-Duque Parental investment without kin recognition: simple conditional rules for parent–offspring behavior, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, no.55 (Dec 2010): 1079–1091.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1115-9Todd A. Surovell, Nicole M. Waguespack Human Prey Choice in the Late Pleistocene and Its Relation to Megafaunal Extinctions, (Jan 2009): 77–105.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8793-6_5Monica L. Smith Territories, corridors, and networks: A biological model for the premodern state, Complexity 12, no.44 (Jan 2007): 28–35.https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20173Ivana Čače, Joanna J. Bryson Agent Based Modelling of Communication Costs: Why Information Can Be Free, (Jan 2007): 305–321.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-779-4_16Nicole H. Hess, Edward H. Hagen Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity, Human Nature 17, no.33 (Sep 2006): 337–354.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1013-zCharlotte J. S. De Backer, Michael Gurven Whispering Down the Lane: The Economics of Vicarious Information Transfer, Adaptive Behavior 14, no.33 (Jul 2016): 249–264.https://doi.org/10.1177/105971230601400303R. Keith Sawyer Social Emergence, 1 (May 2010).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734892W.G. Runciman STONE AGE SOCIOLOGY, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11, no.11 (Mar 2005): 129–142.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2005.00229.xR. Keith Sawyer Artificial Societies, Sociological Methods & Research 31, no.33 (Jun 2016): 325–363.https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102239079 John W. Pepper and Barbara B. Smuts A Mechanism for the Evolution of Altruism among Nonkin: Positive Assortment through Environmental Feedback. J. W. Pepper and B. B. Smuts, The American Naturalist 160, no.22 (Jul 2015): 205–213.https://doi.org/10.1086/341018Adi Livnat, Marcus W. Feldman The evolution of cooperation on the internet, Complexity 6, no.66 (Jan 2001): 19–23.https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.10007