Abstract

Although individual cancer cells are generally considered the Darwinian units of selection in malignant populations, they frequently act as members of groups where fitness of the group cannot be reduced to the average fitness of individual group members. A growing body of studies reveals limitations of reductionist approaches to explaining biological and clinical observations. For example, induction of angiogenesis, inhibition of the immune system, and niche engineering through environmental acidification and/or remodeling of extracellular matrix cannot be achieved by single tumor cells and require collective actions of groups of cells. Success or failure of such group activities depends on the phenotypic makeup of the individual group members. Conversely, these group activities affect the fitness of individual members of the group, ultimately affecting the composition of the group. This phenomenon, where phenotypic makeup of individual group members impacts the fitness of both members and groups, has been captured in the term ‘group phenotypic composition’ (GPC). We provide examples where considerations of GPC could help in understanding the evolution and clinical progression of cancers and argue that use of the GPC framework can facilitate new insights into cancer biology and assist with the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Highlights

  • Primary cancers often display high levels of phenotypic and genetic intratumor heterogeneity (ITH)

  • We suggest applying an ecological concept termed ‘group phenotypic composition’ (GPC), to understand the ecology/evolutionary dynamics of cancer

  • Following Farine et al, 2015 framework, we propose that addressing the role of GPC as both an agent of selection shaping individual fitness and an emergent property of the individual phenotypes can help understand cancer progression and predict ways that can alter GPC to affect both individual- and group-level outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Primary cancers often display high levels of phenotypic and genetic intratumor heterogeneity (ITH). Promising aspects could include (1) the importance of epigenetic modulation of gene expression in cancer cells vs the Baldwin effect (process by which plasticity facilitates evolution) in whole organisms, (2) how might the asexual nature of cancer cell reproduction influence individual–group evolutionary relationships relative to sexually reproductive individuals in other ecosystems, and (3) what phenotypes in cancer need to be quantified to be able to produce group selection models that are useful for describing progression or influencing clinical practice. Dynamic changes in the epithelial and mesenchymal composition of CTC clusters in breast cancer have been associated with disease progression (Yu et al, 2013) It is less clear whether this heterogeneity reflects potential cooperative interactions among cells within a CTC cluster and whether this change in GPC impacts metastatic efficiency. While only a few of the many pathways/molecules involved in clonal cooperativity are characterized, it should be expected that the coming years will bring new opportunities to inhibit this aspect of tumor biology

Concluding remarks
Findings
Funding Funder ANR
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call