Abstract

Two-person groups were compared under conditions of undivided vs divided task information, to test the hypothesis that a group advantage exists (in pooled individual scores vs group scores comparison) due to the group's ability to divide a task among group members. While evidence was shown that individual group members work on different task areas, no support was obtained for the basic hypothesis. An equal energy hypothesis was suggested to account for the apparent equality of performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.