Abstract

Territorial social species, including humans, compete between groups over key resources. This between-group competition has evolutionary implications on adaptations like in-group cooperation even with non-kin. An emergent property of between-group competition is group dominance. Mechanisms of group dominance in wild animal populations are difficult to study, as they require long-term data on several groups within a population. Here, using long-term data on four neighbouring groups of wild western chimpanzees, we test the hypothesis that group dominance impacts the costs and benefits of between-group competition, measured by territory size and the pressure exerted by neighbouring groups. Larger groups had larger territories and suffered less neighbour pressure compared with smaller groups. Within-group increase in the number of males led to territory increase, suggesting the role of males in territory acquisition. However, variation in territory sizes and neighbour pressure was better explained by group size. This suggests that the bisexually-bonded social system of western chimpanzees, where females participate in territorial behaviour, confers a competitive advantage to larger groups and that group dominance acts through group size in this population. Considering variation in social systems offers new insights on how group dominance acts in territorial species and its evolutionary implications on within-group cooperation.

Highlights

  • Territorial social species, including humans, compete between groups over key resources

  • This suggests that the bisexually-bonded social system of western chimpanzees, where females participate in territorial behaviour, confers a competitive advantage to larger groups and that group dominance acts through group size in this population

  • Adult males seem to play an important role in group dominance: inter-group aggression is more likely to occur when the number of males in a group is high [21]; in Ngogo (Uganda), inter-group killings by males seemed targeted toward a small neighbouring group, leading across time to a territorial expansion [25], suggesting that the Ngogo group dominated the smaller one

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Territorial social species, including humans, compete between groups over key resources. Variation in territory sizes and neighbour pressure was better explained by group size This suggests that the bisexually-bonded social system of western chimpanzees, where females participate in territorial behaviour, confers a competitive advantage to larger groups and that group dominance acts through group size in this population. Some western chimpanzee populations, including the different groups of the Taï population [20,30,33] and the Bossou group [34], are characterized by a bisexually-bonded system, where both males and females occupy a similar territory and actively participate in territorial behaviour [20,35,36] These differences in social structures may imply different mechanisms of group dominance.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call