Abstract

This paper fits in the context of glottal closure instant (GCI) detection. Based on the algorithmic steps of DYPSA method and those set by the Multiscale-Product of LPC residual signal, MP(e(n)), method, it is proposed to compare the effect of Group Delay function followed by Dynamic Programming with that of the MP method, with a view to GCI detection. Results of this comparative approach are presented in terms of reliability, accuracy, and cost of execution in a clean environment. Also, the robustness of the performances of these two methods is compared in the presence of white and babble noise. According to all comparison made, we can conclude that the Group Delay function followed by Dynamic Programming is inefficient in the GCI detection compared to the MP method.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.