Abstract

Different assembly processes may simultaneously affect local-scale variation of species composition in temperate old-growth forests. Ground layer species diversity reflects chance colonization and persistence of low-dispersal species, as well as fine-scale environmental heterogeneity. The latter depends on both purely abiotic factors, such as soil properties and topography, and factors primarily determined by overstorey structure, such as light availability. Understanding the degree to which plant diversity in old-growth forests is associated with structural heterogeneity and/or to dispersal limitation will help assessing the effectiveness of silvicultural practices that recreate old-growth patterns and structures for the conservation or restoration of plant diversity. We used a nested sampling design to assess fine-scale species turnover, i.e. the proportion of species composition that changes among sampling units, across 11 beech-dominated old-growth forests in Southern Europe. For each stand, we also measured a wide range of environmental and structural variables that might explain ground layer species turnover. Our aim was to quantify the relative importance of dispersal limitation in comparison to that of stand structural heterogeneity while controlling for other sources of environmental heterogeneity. For this purpose, we used multiple regression on distance matrices at the within-stand extent, and mixed effect models at the extent of the whole dataset. Species turnover was best predicted by structural and environmental heterogeneity, especially by differences in light availability and in topsoil nutrient concentration and texture. Spatial distances were significant only in four out of eleven stands with a relatively low explanatory power. This suggests that structural heterogeneity is a more important driver of local-scale ground layer species turnover than dispersal limitation in southern European old-growth beech forests.

Highlights

  • The composition of plant species assemblages varies in space and time as a result of the complex interplay among several structuring factors [1]

  • Structural heterogeneity rather than dispersal limitation is the main driver of floristic turnover

  • Our work provides insights into the mechanisms underlying ground layer species assembly in beech dominated old-growth forests

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The composition of plant species assemblages varies in space and time as a result of the complex interplay among several structuring factors [1]. Spatial distribution of plant species depends on different mechanisms related to their tolerances to environmental factors, intra- and inter-specific interactions (e.g. dispersal, competition, herbivory, pathogens) and random variation. Floristic patterns may be expected to mostly reflect the effects of dispersal limitation and random survival [7,14]. This complexity has fostered a longstanding debate on the degree to which community assembly is a result of niche vs neutral processes, which was revived after the publication of Hubbell’s book on the neutral theory of biodiversity [15]. Most studies addressing the issue since have found both neutral and niche processes to operate simultaneously [2,8,9,14,16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call