Abstract

This paper reviews LiDAR ground filtering algorithms used in the process of creating Digital Elevation Models. We discuss critical issues for the development and application of LiDAR ground filtering algorithms, including filtering procedures for different feature types, and criteria for study site selection, accuracy assessment, and algorithm classification. This review highlights three feature types for which current ground filtering algorithms are suboptimal, and which can be improved upon in future studies: surfaces with rough terrain or discontinuous slope, dense forest areas that laser beams cannot penetrate, and regions with low vegetation that is often ignored by ground filters.

Highlights

  • LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) technology determines the distance between ground objects and sensors by measuring the time a pulse of transmitted energy takes to return to the LiDAR sensor.When coupled with a ground referencing system, LiDAR sensors make dense, geo-referenced point elevation measurements [1,2,3]

  • LiDAR ground filtering methods may have variable performance when applied to different areas and terrain conditions

  • Accuracy assessment plays an important role in both ground filtering applications and algorithm development [77]; quantitative accuracy assessment has been a challenge for LiDAR ground filtering due to the lack of ground truth data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) technology determines the distance between ground objects and sensors by measuring the time a pulse of transmitted energy takes to return to the LiDAR sensor. The dense LiDAR point clouds enable generation of highly accurate, high resolution DEMs. Second, surface features can be extracted based on a height context analysis of the. It is easier to identify slight elevation changes using dense LiDAR point clouds, making it easier to map regions with little textural variations, including variations in the surface of vegetation canopies [15,23]. LiDAR can be used to map ground elevations even in regions of dense vegetation because of multiple returns [15]. We discuss the conditions that lead to the performance levels of each algorithm This comparison and discussion is especially important for new users of LiDAR data. Seeking to select an appropriate ground filtering algorithm and for developers seeking to improve algorithms

Ground Characteristics Used for LiDAR Ground Filtering
Difficult Ground Features for LiDAR Ground Filtering
General Ground Filtering Procedures
Ground Filtering
Study Site Selection Considerations for Ground Filtering
Slope and Elevation Difference
Surface Covering
Size of Study Area
Number of Study Sites
Accuracy Assessment
Ground Filtering Algorithms
Progressive morphology
Comparative Studies and the MGF Algorithm
Interpolation Methods
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.