Abstract
This article first examines the MGM Studios v. Grokster (CRI 2005, 109-114 with remarks by Wittow at pp. 114-115) decision and attempts to interpret the inducement test. Then, Grokster is compared with the recent Australian decision in Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd. v. Sharman License Holdings Ltd., [2005] FCA 1242 (= CRI 2005, 140-147). The article concludes with practical guidance for technology companies participating in the global marketplace.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
