Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads

Abstract

We investigated grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) selection of three road types in the northern United States and southern British Columbia from 1986 to 1991. We hypothesized that grizzly bears select against open (public use allowed), restricted (forestry use only), and closed roads (no public use allowed) in that order. We analyzed use of roads for 11 bears (five females and six males) in an area containing open and closed roads and 11 bears (seven females and four males) in an adjacent area containing restricted roads. We used χ2 and log–linear models to test for selection of habitat type and distance to road categories. Ten of 12 females and 5 of 10 males (15 of 22 bears) selected against (P < 0.05) low-elevation interior cedar-hemlock and for (P < 0.05) high-elevation Englemann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) – subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.). After accounting for habitat, 4 of 5 females and 3 of 6 males (7 of 11 bears) selected against open roads and 3 of 5 females and 0 of 6 males (3 of 11 bears) selected against closed roads. No females (n = 7) or males (n = 4) (0 of 11 bears) selected against restricted roads. Our results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that bears select against open, restricted, and closed roads in that order. Most females and males selected against open roads, most females selected against closed roads, and no bears selected against restricted roads. The type of human activity along roads plays a role in bear responses to roads, and this aspect should be incorporated into future bear-road studies.