Abstract

THERE is one consideration which your correspondents, the secretary of the Scottish, and the president of the British Meteorological Societies have equally overlooked, and which may seriously affect the conclusions at which they arrive as to the suitability of Greenwich for a first-class meteorological station. Since the year 1846 the temperature observations at Greenwich have been made under conditions of exposure of thermometers which, whatever their merits or demerits, are not those usually adopted. In a paper published in the Quarterly Journal of the Meteorological Society (October, 1873) I have shown from the average of five years' daily comparisons that the effect of the method adopted at Greenwich upon the mean annual temperature is to obtain a result 0°.475 warmer than is obtained by the usual method. This quantity is almost identical with the excess which Mr. Eaton attributes to the local consumption of fuel, an explanation surely most inadequate. Thus the discrepancy pointed out by Mr. Eaton only serves to establish his opponent's case. Mr. Buchan on the other hand must be unaware that it is the eye observations alone, made from the revolving stand, that are relied upon for temperature results at Greenwich, and though his conclusion would seem to be correct it does not seem possible to sustain the argument by which he has arrived at it.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.