Abstract

Shallow drainage (e.g. mole and gravel mole drainage installed at 0.55 m below soil surface) is used on pasture-based farms to reduce soil moisture, deepen water table depth and thus increase grass utilization on soils with impeded drainage. There is, however, a lack of research on the effect that these drainage techniques have on soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Hence the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of mole and gravel mole drainage on soil GHG fluxes. Soil nitrous oxide (N2O), soil root respiration (CO2) and soil methane (CH4) fluxes were measured in two experiments conducted over a 36 month period. The experiments were conducted on permanent grassland with impeded drainage on a eutric gleysol (humic) in Ireland (52°30′N, 08°12′W). Both experiments were arranged in randomized complete block design. There were three treatments: (i) undrained control, (ii) mole drainage and (iii) gravel mole drainage. Soil GHG fluxes, soil water filled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature were measured on a weekly basis and soil mineral nitrogen (N), herbage N uptake, soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total N (TN) were measured seasonally and annually over the sampling period. Drainage treatments (P < 0.05) deepened (mean ± SE) the water table by 0.17±0.03 m and decreased WFPS by 7±0.2%. However no (P > 0.05) impact of drainage treatment was detected on soil average daily GHG fluxes (9.84±6.34g N2O-N ha−1day−1, 34.05 ± 12.90 kg CO2-C ha−1day−1 and −0.91 ± 3.70 g CH4-C ha-1day-1), soil N mineralisation, soil N nitrification, SOC and TN in both experiments. The results indicate that mole and gravel mole drainage can be installed on farms with similar management and soil type to that described in the present study without impact on the soil GHG emissions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call