Abstract

Non-native species introductions are associated with a range of ecosystem changes such as habitat destruction, competition with native species, and biodiversity losses. Less well known is the role non-native species play in altering biogeochemical processes, such as the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). In this study we used laboratory incubations to compare seasonal (spring, summer, fall) emissions of the GHGs nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2) from native (Crassostrea virginica) and non-native (Ostrea edulis) oysters collected from a northern temperate estuary (Duxbury Bay, Massachusetts, USA). We observed strong seasonal signals in GHG fluxes, where C. virginica was the higher GHG emitter, and produced on average twice as much N2O (0.39 nmol g-1 dry tissue weight hr-1) and twenty times as much CH4 (1.31 nmol g DTW-1 hr-1) compared to O. edulis (0.16 nmol N2O g DTW-1 hr-1 and 0.07 nmol CH4 g DTW-1 hr-1). C. virginica also had significantly (p < 0.001) higher summer maximum production rates of CO2 compared to O. edulis (53.4 mol g DTW-1 hr-1 and 45.4 mol g DTW-1 hr-1, respectively). Despite these differences, chlorophyll-a consumption rates between the species were similar (p = 0.95). These results suggest that the non-native O. edulis is a lower GHG emitter than the native C. virginica and highlight that, at least in terms of GHG emissions, this non-native species introduction may not be detrimental to the environment.

Highlights

  • The introduction of non-native species to both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is a growing global concern (Vitousek et al, 1996; Castro-Díez et al, 2019; Seebens et al, 2019)

  • O. edulis used in the experiment were longer than C. virginica

  • We show that greenhouse gases (GHGs) fluxes and chlorophylla consumption rates were not driven by a common set of environmental parameters, nor did fluxes vary consistently with oyster characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The introduction of non-native species to both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is a growing global concern (Vitousek et al, 1996; Castro-Díez et al, 2019; Seebens et al, 2019) In some cases, these non-native species have led to dramatic declines in biodiversity (Molnar et al, 2008) and displacement of native species (Byers, 2000; Rossong et al, 2006). A recent meta-analysis examined the impact of 76 exotic marine species (just 6% of the listed exotics) on marine communities and found that these species caused a small, but significant decrease in ecological variables such as primary producers and multi-trophic assemblages (Anton et al, 2019) Of note, they reported that mollusks were one of just four taxonomic groups related to declines in the ecological function of many native marine taxa (Anton et al, 2019). M. gigas has reportedly changed sediment properties (Green et al, 2012), shifted macrozoobenthic

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call