Abstract

A multi-level perspective (MLP) in studying sustainability transitions has proved its relevance in explaining the institutionalisation of sustainability ideas. However, MLP does not offer tools to grasp the dynamics of culture between knowledge regimes that occur in different loci in global-local scales. The article introduces a framework for cultural analysis by creating a crossover conceptual approach to culture in different spatial scales combining elements of MLP logic with Thomas Eriksen’s idea of the ‘clashes of scales’. Scalar dynamics related to sustainability transitions are explored through the centre–periphery patterns by reanalysing empirical data from the authors’ previous projects, which examine local responses to meet the ideas or assignments given by upscale actors. The article shows that culture is a factor that does not stick to one level of development but crosscuts through spatial scales, thus providing transitional corridors. Through various representations, culture anchors floating sustainability to a certain mentality of rule and constitutes an implicit element of the whole transition process, providing a challenge for the traditional grammar of pro-environmental diffusion. In this process, peripheral states of mind tend to mediate and integrate different ideological motivations into a local cultural reaction to sustainability transition.

Highlights

  • Sustainability transition can be described as an ‘institutionalised change’ to ecologically more sustainable products, production methods and systems in different industrial fields and disciplines

  • The centre–periphery question highlights the clash of viewpoints, which emanate from different perspectives, and which are given a different value in global and/or national discussions on the means and goals of sustainability transitions

  • In the following we describe how the centre–periphery frameworks shape the scalar dynamics of cultural sustainability transition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustainability transition can be described as an ‘institutionalised change’ to ecologically more sustainable products, production methods and systems in different industrial fields and disciplines. Sustainability transitions do not occur only as concrete changes such as technological innovations or new practices, but as shifts in the collective but contested systems of meaning-making (STRN, 2019) They are processes that are interpreted and given meaning by site-specific actors/stakeholders representing different motivations and goals. Cultural change is regarded as shifts in the collective but contested systems of meaning, which can be both cognitive ‘models of’ and normative ‘models for’ action (STRN, 2019) This cultural dimension in sustainability transitions produces ‘unexpected curves’ in their development, as the process is understood according to various rationalities from business life to social movements (Geels et al 2017). The centre–periphery question highlights the clash of viewpoints, which emanate from different perspectives (knowledge regimes), and which are given a different value in global and/or national discussions on the means and goals of sustainability transitions

Methods
Discussion and conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.