Abstract
Background Vasopressin may be a potential cause of spasm in both the radial artery and the internal thoracic artery. This study compared the vasopressin-induced contraction and the effects of milrinone, nitroglycerin, and nitroprusside in vasopressin-induced contraction between the human radial artery and the internal thoracic artery to find effective antispastic methods for arterial grafts. Methods Concentration-contraction (normalized as force gram produced by each millimeter of the circumference tissue of the artery) curves for vasopressin with or without pretreatment of vasodilators and concentration-relaxation curves for the vasodilators listed were established in the human radial artery (n = 107) and internal thoracic artery (n = 122) segments. Results Vasopressin induced a greater contraction in the radial artery than in the internal thoracic artery (1.9 ± 0.2 g/mm vs 0.6 ± 0.1 g/mm, P < .001) with a higher sensitivity (lower EC 50: −9.28 ± 0.11 vs −8.91 ± 0.05 log 10M, P = .006). Milrinone was less potent than nitroglycerin and nitroprusside with higher EC 50 ( P < .05) in both the internal thoracic artery and radial artery. Pretreatment with milrinone and nitroprusside significantly inhibited vasopressin contraction in the internal thoracic artery but had little effect in the radial artery. Pretreatment with nitroglycerin did not significantly inhibit the maximum vasopressin contraction in either the internal thoracic artery or radial artery. Conclusion The radial artery is more prone to develop spasm related to vasopressin than is the internal thoracic artery, and the effect of vasodilators in vasopressin-induced contraction is different in the radial artery from that in the internal thoracic artery. A more significant prophylactic antispastic effect of milrinone and nitroprusside is demonstrated in the internal thoracic artery than in the radial artery. Therefore, more intensive antispastic treatment is necessary in the radial artery than in the internal thoracic artery during coronary artery bypass grafting.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.