Greater stability of carbon capture in species-rich natural forests compared to species-poor plantations

Tree plantations and forest restoration are leading strategies for enhancing terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration and mitigating climate change. While it is well established that species-rich natural forests offer superior C sequestering benefits relative to short-rotation commercial monoculture plantations, differences in rates of C capture and storage between longer-lived plantations (commercial or non-commercial) and natural forests remain unclear. Using a natural experiment in the Western Ghats of India, where late-20th century conservation laws prohibited timber extraction from monodominant plantations and natural forests within nature reserves, we assessed forests and plantations for aboveground C storage and the magnitude and temporal stability of rates of photosynthetic C capture (gross primary production). Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that species-rich forests show greater temporal stability of C capture, and are more resistant to drought, than monodominant plantations. Carbon stocks in monodominant teak (Tectona grandis) and Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) plantations were 30%\u201350% lower than in natural evergreen forests, but differed little from moist-deciduous forests. Plantations had 4%\u20139% higher average C capture rates (estimated using the Enhanced Vegetation Index\u2013EVI) than natural forests during wet seasons, but up to 29% lower C capture during dry seasons across the 2000\u201318 period. In both seasons, the rate of C capture by plantations was less stable across years, and decreased more...