Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare home fruit and vegetable (FV) availability between previous Athletes for Life (AFL) participants and a comparison group (CG).MethodsThe AFL group completed AFL 3 months prior to data collection. AFL was a twice weekly‐10 week health promotion intervention delivered in a community center to underserved families with a 6‐11 year old child. Parent sessions included a 45‐min nutrition lesson that utilized education, hands‐on activities, and behavior change strategies to promote improvements in dietary habits and the home food environment. Child sessions included a 10‐min interactive nutrition lesson. CG were families with a 6‐11 year old child who received no intervention prior to data collection. Trained research assistants assessed home FV availability at participants' homes via a modified Home Food Inventory that included 26 fruits and 20 vegetables. Analyses were a cross‐sectional comparison between AFL and CG. An independent samples t‐test examined differences in FV availability between groups.ResultsAFL parents (n=14) were 36.5±5.6 years, 100% Latino immigrants, 93% living with partner, 71% BMI > 25, with 2.9±1.6 children. CG (n=20) parents were 38.3±8.1 years, 90% Latino, 80% immigrants, 90% living with partner, 94% BMI > 25, with 2.6±1.1 children. The AFL group had significantly higher vegetable (9.1±3.3 vs. 7.3±2.0; p<0.05) but not fruit (7.6±3.6 vs. 5.9±2.0; p>0.05) availability than the CG. Combined FV availability was significantly higher in the AFL group (p<0.05).ConclusionThe AFL program shows promise for improving availability of vegetables in the home, which may influence family dietary patterns.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.